Evidence presented to the jury:
A) Dredd knowing about Ephram Fargo but never mentioning him before.
B) Dredd knowing Fargo was corrupt but not thinking he was corrupt in
the Cal Files story (kinda huge continuity contradiction).
C) Dredd losing his power to fight hick town cops and mutants in
Origins yet being tough as nails in the follow-up Dredd story 'Fifty
Year Man'.
D) Dredd wanting mutants to have human rights - and using hissy 'back
me or I quit' tactics. Shameful behaviour from Dredd.
E) Judges voting for pro-mutant reform because they don't want Dredd
to quit. Lame reason to change the law.
F) Hershey giving mutants their own private lawgivers. Lawgivers are
not gifts - they're lethal handguns used by Judges (rolling my
eyes!).
Whilst we can all admire Mr Wagner's magnificent work on Dredd, a
body
of work second to none, I urge the jury to find the aforementioned
negligent in his writing of recent Judge Dredd stories.
Phantom scojocupcake
