On Mar 16, 5:15=A0pm, "Kelt" <k...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I've got the muppet killfiled. =A0Any time he changes his id I can
identif=
y
> him after one sentence on his new id, and immediately killfile him.
>
> The problem arises when people respond to his ****e and leave his post
in
> the body of their post, meaning I'm exposed to aforementioned ****e even
> though hes killfiled.
>
> The guy's obviously got huge, huge issues.. you don't have to be a
profess=
or
> of mentalsim to appreciate that... so the best thing to do would be
> immediately killfile him. =A0And if we can't do that then don't cite his
s=
hite
> in the body of your response.
>
> He was amusing for 10 minutes 10 years ago.
>
> Now it's just tremendously sad and wearying.
>
> "john smith" <the_johnsm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:E30Cj.20217$kN5.72@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > "Phantom scojocupcake" <bo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>news:0f75e432-61d9-4fee-a7d2-23790d6a27d9@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>I miss the old 'less complicated' world of Dredd. Sure, I know stories
> >> have to change, you can't stay still, but this mutant storyline is
> >> changing Dredd and his world and *not* for the better.
>
> >> I think Wagner should consider writing some new Dredds with his old
> >> partner Alan Grant. Let's have some of the old Wagner/Grant magic
> >> back. That was classic Dredd. The dark comedy, the exaggerated sci-fi
> >> take on 20th century life.
>
> >> This current 'social conscience' Dredd is doing serious damage to
> >> Dredd's legacy. Save us from that!
>
> >> Phantom scojocupcake
>
> > Do you age in real time like the rest of us? =A0Things change - get
used=
to
> > it.
>
> > By the way - I'm gonna killfile as of Thursday unless you tell us what
y=
ou
> > affliction (mental illness?) =A0is. =A0Perhaps then I'd feel
sorry/under=
stand
> > you better...
>
> > Otherwise: trip-trap-trip-trap... =A0over MYYYYY bridge...
Kelt, I stand by all by comments about current Dredd - I think the
character and his world are being ruined by Wagner's social conscience
approach. I've just read this over on the 2K forum:
"and the Fargos come to visit. "
Can't wait. :P
The whole mutant/Fargo/lawgiver/Dredd petulant 'thing' is awful.
Wagner's still great when he writes pure Dredd (Wagner is Dredd!) -
but the mutant storyline is the biggest mistake in the character's
history. It's undermining Dredd's world and Dredd's character. And the
lawgiver bit was the lowest point - the moment Dredd reached an all-
time low, when Dredd fans the world over put their heads in their
hands, gave out a big sigh and said "why, John?". I don't know what
Wagner was thinking when he thought that idea up, but boy, what a
stinker!"
Hand on heart, I haven't read the fifth and sixth pages of last week's
Dredd because I'm so upset with Wagner sticking in the crass idea of
mutants getting lawgivers. I don't think I can read further Dredd. I
don't identify with it. It's not the Dredd I want to read. If someone
had said, "hey, scojo, in a few years time a Chief Judge will give
mutants their own private lawgivers" I would have never believed it. I
would have said, "that's too ridiculous" - but it's happened.
Daniel Craig as James Bond and Wagner reinventing Dredd - two of my
favourite childhood characters now ruined! :(
Phantom scojocupcake
|
