On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:18:13 -0700, Phantom scojocupcake wrote:
> On Mar 26, 9:14 pm, burlea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> > There is a distinct chance 'Watchmen the movie' will be better than
>> > 'Watchmen the comic book'. I say this because Watchmen the comic book
>> > has little action and I think a 2000s Watchmen will have to look
>> > spectacular, have some impressive action sequences - sequences where
>> > we see the Watchmen fighting crime. People love Watchmen because it's
>> > a cerebral comic book, you gotta think about its meaning, think about
>> > what Moore is trying to convey, but that won't work as well with Joe
>> > and Jane Shmoe movie goer. It's gotta have some good action in it. If
>> > you combine Moore's comic book sensibility with modern movie
>> > techniques
>> > scojomoo
>>
>> HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAAHAHA, jesus what ****e.
>
> Yeah, but with respect, not as ****y as mutants getting lawgivers.
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
>
> scojomoo (aged four)
I thought that little bit was funny with the mutant kid nearly getting
shot by missile locking in on him after manouver by dog bird thingy...
and why should Dredd not feel a sense of attachment to natural (albeit a
bit mutie... no disrespect...) descendants of his clone source....
|
