On 7 May, 10:08, Phantom scojocupcake <bo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> 2K poster:
>
> "I don't think it was very nice of you John to attack Jimbo in the way
> that you did. He did not refer to you personally, but made a reference
> to your work and expectations based on previous projects you have
> worked on. In return you attacked him personally which is below the
> belt. For someone who has a lot of respect from the people, including
> myself, on this board you've not done yourself any favours by your
> posts here. I just think it's sad the way that you responded. A writer
> of your cailber, experience and creativity (one I might add who always
> stretches the boundaries when it comes to writing for 2000AD) should
> be able to respond in a constructive, understanding and intelligent
> way. Instead we have a rambling diatribe that makes me want to believe
> you are not who you say you are."
>
> Oh dear, I think John should stay here and insult me instead! :)
>
> scojomoo
You just live for this sort of thing, don't you, you sad little ****?
I might be one of the people thinking that John, a) responded harshly
and b) handled being called on that response badly- but he's still got
a long way to go before he sinks to the level that you crawl about at.
|
