"Matt Timson" <matt.timson@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:a4c63208-fe5f-4823-997c-2b8107730d38@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 7 May, 10:08, Phantom scojocupcake <bo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 2K poster:
>>
>> "I don't think it was very nice of you John to attack Jimbo in the way
>> that you did. He did not refer to you personally, but made a reference
>> to your work and expectations based on previous projects you have
>> worked on. In return you attacked him personally which is below the
>> belt. For someone who has a lot of respect from the people, including
>> myself, on this board you've not done yourself any favours by your
>> posts here. I just think it's sad the way that you responded. A writer
>> of your cailber, experience and creativity (one I might add who always
>> stretches the boundaries when it comes to writing for 2000AD) should
>> be able to respond in a constructive, understanding and intelligent
>> way. Instead we have a rambling diatribe that makes me want to believe
>> you are not who you say you are."
>>
>> Oh dear, I think John should stay here and insult me instead! :)
You sad masochist. Please don't switch your perversity from one John
(Wagner) to another. NEITHER of us want YOU as a stalker - virtual or
otherwise... (Daniel Craig either, hmmm - like you were right about that
one
too, obviously.)
Is it your medication - or lack of - that makes you come out with such
bull****?
>>
>> scojomoo
>
> You just live for this sort of thing, don't you, you sad little ****?
> I might be one of the people thinking that John, a) responded harshly
> and b) handled being called on that response badly- but he's still got
> a long way to go before he sinks to the level that you crawl about at.
|
