On May 8, 12:17=A0am, "john smith" <the_johnsm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Matt Timson" <matt.tim...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:a4c63208-fe5f-4823-997c-2b8107730d38@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On 7 May, 10:08, Phantom scojocupcake <bo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> 2K poster:
>
> >> "I don't think it was very nice of you John to attack Jimbo in the
way
> >> that you did. He did not refer to you personally, but made a
reference
> >> to your work and expectations based on previous projects you have
> >> worked on. In return you attacked him personally which is below the
> >> belt. For someone who has a lot of respect from the people, including
> >> myself, on this board you've not done yourself any favours by your
> >> posts here. I just think it's sad the way that you responded. A
writer
> >> of your cailber, experience and creativity (one I might add who
always
> >> stretches the boundaries when it comes to writing for 2000AD) should
> >> be able to respond in a constructive, understanding and intelligent
> >> way. Instead we have a rambling diatribe that makes me want to
believe
> >> you are not who you say you are."
>
> >> Oh dear, I think John should stay here and insult me instead! :)
>
> You sad masochist. =A0Please don't switch your perversity from one John
> (Wagner) to another. =A0NEITHER of us want YOU as a stalker - virtual or
> otherwise... (Daniel Craig either, hmmm - like you were right about that
o=
ne
> too, obviously.)
>
> Is it your medication - or lack of - that makes you come out with such
> bull****?
>
Seeing as you only reply to my posts and never make other posts here,
I'd say you fit the definition of an internet stalker, not me. As for
this supposed bullsh*t of mine, I was posting a reply someone made
about one of your earlier comments on the 2K board. Instead of coming
across as a pro writer, you came across like some four year old having
a temper tantrum - "oh, they don't like my work so I'll insult them
and the board." I'm sure the message boarders will appreciate
that. :P
I accept a lot of message boarders write ignorant stuff - if they
don't like something they make asinine comments - "the artwork is too
muddy blah blah blah so I can't follow the story." I try to be
constructive when I criticize - such as: it makes no sense for Judges
to give lawgivers to mutants because they're lethal handguns, not
gifts, or it makes no sense for mutants to follow Booth because he
created them. I try to explain my criticism. Most fans on the official
board tend to have a "this is crap but I can't explain why" attitude.
Not that you care about my opinion, but I'm enjoying Dead Eyes.
scojomoo
|
