On 8 May, 09:17, Phantom scojocupcake <bo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 8, 12:17=A0am, "john smith" <the_johnsm...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Matt Timson" <matt.tim...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
>news:a4c63208-fe5f-4823-997c-2b8107730d38@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > On 7 May, 10:08, Phantom scojocupcake <bo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > >> 2K poster:
>
> > >> "I don't think it was very nice of you John to attack Jimbo in the
wa=
y
> > >> that you did. He did not refer to you personally, but made a
referenc=
e
> > >> to your work and expectations based on previous projects you have
> > >> worked on. In return you attacked him personally which is below the
> > >> belt. For someone who has a lot of respect from the people,
including=
> > >> myself, on this board you've not done yourself any favours by your
> > >> posts here. I just think it's sad the way that you responded. A
write=
r
> > >> of your cailber, experience and creativity (one I might add who
alway=
s
> > >> stretches the boundaries when it comes to writing for 2000AD)
should
> > >> be able to respond in a constructive, understanding and intelligent
> > >> way. Instead we have a rambling diatribe that makes me want to
believ=
e
> > >> you are not who you say you are."
>
> > >> Oh dear, I think John should stay here and insult me instead! :)
>
> > You sad masochist. =A0Please don't switch your perversity from one
John
> > (Wagner) to another. =A0NEITHER of us want YOU as a stalker - virtual
or=
> > otherwise... (Daniel Craig either, hmmm - like you were right about
that=
one
> > too, obviously.)
>
> > Is it your medication - or lack of - that makes you come out with such
> > bull****?
>
> Seeing as you only reply to my posts and never make other posts here,
> I'd say you fit the definition of an internet stalker, not me. As for
> this supposed bullsh*t of mine, I was posting a reply someone made
> about one of your earlier comments on the 2K board. =A0Instead of coming
> across as a pro writer, you came across like some four year old having
> a temper tantrum - "oh, they don't like my work so I'll insult them
> and the board." I'm sure the message boarders will appreciate
> that. :P
>
> I accept a lot of message boarders write ignorant stuff - if they
> don't like something they make asinine comments - "the artwork is too
> muddy blah blah blah so I can't follow the story." I try to be
> constructive when I criticize - such as: it makes no sense for Judges
> to give lawgivers to mutants because they're lethal handguns, not
> gifts, or it makes no sense for mutants to follow Booth because he
> created them. I try to explain my criticism. Most fans on the official
> board tend to have a "this is crap but I can't explain why" attitude.
> Not that you care about my opinion, but I'm enjoying Dead Eyes.
>
> scojomoo
Irony, thy name is Scott Nestel...
|
