Re: Kirsten Dunst Confirms Venom And Sandman To Be Spidey 3 Villians! --

On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 13:11:45 -0400, "Jon J. Yeager" <no@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:

>This may or may not mean anything, but Dunst did the exact same thing on
the 
>Tonight Show before Spider-Man 2 came out... "oops"-ing mentions of
Lizard 
>and Doc Ock, confirming what had only been rumored 'til then. So she is 
>either dumber than dirt for doing it again, or this is just a publicity 
>stunt.
>
>As we know, Lizard didn't really appear, but Doc Connors did, in the form
of 
>a brief cameo. So if the past in any indication, only one of either Grace
or 
>Church might be the central villain in SM3, while the other could have a 
>small cameo à la Connors.
>
>If Grace has the cameo, I'm guessing he is setting up either a spin-off 
>movie of his own, or setting the stage to be the main villain in SM4, 
>leaving Sandman and Hobgoblin as the villains in SM3.
>
>If Church has the small cameo, perhaps being quickly bagged by Spidey at
the 
>beginning of the movie, then Venom has center stage for the rest of the 
>flick.
>
>Of course, it's all just speculation.
>
>Jon

I was thinking the same thing, that maybe this is all a red herring.
IIRC, she has this habit of "releasing" SPidey related news in
interviews.

Lynley