On Jul 5, 10:47 am, grinningdemon <grinningde...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> I was just pointing out what the original poster was probably talking
> about by mentioning Warner Brothers...
I knew what they meant... it was just incredibly stupid.
Why not say "AOL Time/Warner".
The companies have names and exist as entities and should be treated
as such, not as a name used to smeer an idea you don't like (If you
say "Warner Bros" is proves that it is a faceless company that knows
nothing about comics, DC it a little too close and we know the names
of people who work there.)
Ruben was a lot closer to trolling that I was, dispite his claims.
>I agree that DC is probably to
> blame for most of this...although there probably is some pressure from
> the parent company when movies and what not are set to come out...but
> that's not really an issue with the Legion...they're way too broad a
> group and too complicated to ever be made into a movie...at least a
> decent one.
Sounds like 50% on the Superhero sequels made.
===
= DUG.
===
